If you’ve met me, you probably know – I’m super-introverted.
I’m not a hermit or anything, but I’m certainly boring. As previously mentioned I re-read books, I don’t leave the house, I am aimless and lazy. So I’m not the best person to analyze these phenomena.
But, oddly, I’m also a manager, which means that I have to be, at least peripherally, a people person. It’s an integral part of my job to schmooze and gladhand and learn facts and details about strangers’ lives that I would cringe from in normal day-to-day. It’s not that I’m anti-social, I just don’t really welcome that kind of conversation about my personal life, so I don’t force it on others. Except I do, now.
One of the things I’ve seen when working with persistant groups o f people is the constancy of rumor
and intrigue. Even in my current position, which, to be fair, avoids the heights of scheming more prevalent in retail or the like, there are cliques and whispered conversations and a genuine interest in spreading gossip.
These things tend to be uniformly negative – call in people to discuss a new project and they’ll assume they’re being fired. In fact, rumors seem to really only take off when their import causes panic and dismay.
Do we create these environments to stimulate ourselves? Is, perhaps, the entire success of a business model in a corporate environment based on the self-motivation of fear? It seems utterly foreign to me to fabricate terror and uncertainty where none exists – to shape half-heard rumbling into ironclad fact.
Especially when there’s work to do. Why can’t people just do the job?

On the other hand, I had no particular goals. One of our main friction points, when we met, was this aimlessness; I chose a lofty goal after one of these arguments and have worked towards it since then, but it’s not some aching desire within me – just a stopping point. What makes me wonder is why we turned out so differently, and I think there are some contributing factors.